Recent reports indicate that Uganda declined Kenya’s request to access its fuel reserves, citing domestic supply priorities and existing contractual obligations—even after Kenya offered to replace the fuel once its delayed cargo arrives.
The situation comes amid disruptions in global fuel supply chains linked to ongoing conflict in the Middle East, which has affected the docking of fuel vessels at Kenya’s port of Mombasa, a key entry point for the region.
While Uganda relies on Kenya for access to the sea, analysts argue that Kampala’s decision should not be interpreted as a refusal, but rather a limitation imposed by how its fuel supply system is structured.
According to analyst Angelo Izama, Uganda’s petroleum imports are managed through the Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC). However, the fuel held in reserve is not freely available for redistribution.
“Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) place orders through UNOC and pay for the fuel in advance. The stock UNOC is holding already belongs to these domestic clients,” Izama explained.
He added that the fuel is essentially committed supply, awaiting distribution to its rightful owners within Uganda.
“Uganda is not rejecting Kenya’s request—it is unable to fulfil it under the current arrangements. It is unfair to suggest that it has the capacity to do so,” he said.
The development highlights the complexities of regional energy interdependence, where supply chains, contractual obligations, and external shocks can limit flexibility—even among closely linked economies.
About The Author
