While much of the public debate on the Protection of Sovereignty Bill, 2026 has focused on its implications for foreign funding, the legislation’s consequences for free speech and independent journalism are just as significant—and potentially far-reaching.
According to lawyer Philip Karugaba, one of the most concerning provisions is Clause 13, which criminalizes the publication of reports or articles that critique Uganda’s economy or security. Under this clause, journalists, analysts, or even ordinary citizens who write about sensitive topics—such as the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, funded by taxpayers—could face harsh penalties.
Clause 13 sets out severe consequences: publishing such critical material could result in a prison sentence of up to 20 years or a fine of 4 billion shillings. Media freedom advocates warn that these penalties threaten to silence independent reporting, shrink public debate, and undermine the press’s watchdog role over government activities and spending.
The bill, if enacted in its current form, would mark a major shift in Uganda’s media environment—raising serious concerns for journalists, newsrooms, and anyone committed to open, accountable governance.
Parliament continues to gather opinion about the Bill. It is not clear if it will eventually go through. So far, a section of analysts, opposition, and religious leaders have described the Bill as unconsititutional.
About The Author
