Prof. Kateregga and his estranged wife.
KAMPALA — The Uganda Police Force has said it lacks the legal authority to evict Mrs. Jolly Shubaiha Kateregga from her matrimonial residence amid an ongoing domestic dispute with her husband, Professor Badru Ddungu Kateregga, founder of Kampala University.
In a press statement dated July 25, 2025, police noted that the disagreement between the couple, which has drawn significant public interest, is a family matter involving property ownership and management that falls outside the scope of police enforcement.
“The family differences are rooted in property ownership and management, which is out of control of Police and can best be handled by a civil court,” the statement read, referencing guidance received from the Directorate of Public Prosecutions (DPP) on 18th February 2025.
The dispute was formally brought to police attention on November 7, 2024, following a complaint by Prof. Kateregga.
Police confirmed that the matter was fully investigated under file number CID HQRS/GEF 306/204, and the findings were submitted to the DPP for legal advice.
According to the statement, any request for police to remove either party from disputed premises is beyond its mandate unless backed by a lawful court order.
“The alteration of possession of property under dispute can only be effected by a court order. Any request to act outside of this legal framework… cannot be entertained,” the police said.
The police statement follows public debate over whether Mrs. Kateregga should be evicted from the Buziga residence, which Prof. Kateregga has claimed is his personal property.
However, Mrs. Kateregga has denied these claims and maintains she is entitled to remain in the home as legal proceedings unfold.
Police emphasized that they continue to act within the limits of the law and in consultation with relevant legal institutions.
“We work in close collaboration with other institutions, such as the ODPP, whose advice and directives we adhere to without deviation,” the statement added.
The Uganda Police Force also dismissed any notion that it can act unilaterally to enforce property possession or intervene in civil disputes without a court directive.
“Any notion that the police can override the opinion of the ODPP or carry out actions contrary to established legal procedures is unfounded.”
Both Prof. Kateregga and Mrs. Kateregga have issued public statements asserting their positions, with the matter now expected to be addressed through the courts. The police have urged all parties to pursue lawful avenues for resolving their disagreements.
About The Author
